← Home

China Manufacturing 2025 Finale: A Decade of Effort, a Strategic Overtake or a Fruitless Endeavor?

Published:

China Manufacturing 2025, a ten-year plan once filled with high hopes, has now come to an end. When it was launched ambitiously in 2015, its goal was to comprehensively upgrade the manufacturing industry and achieve breakthroughs in several technology sectors. Now, it's time to take stock of this report card: how well were the goals achieved? How big is the gap between Chinese technology and the West? Today, let's delve into this topic.

China Manufacturing 2025: Were the Overall Goals Achieved?

To evaluate the effectiveness of "China Manufacturing 2025," we need to start from three dimensions: overall goals, individual industries, and the actual contribution to the economy.

First, let's look at the overall goals. In discussions, many people often focus on technological breakthroughs in specific industries while ignoring the systemic indicators in the original plan. The notice issued in 2015 actually contained a set of measurement systems, including 12 specific indicators.

Unfortunately, from the final results, only two of these 12 indicators barely met the standard: broadband penetration rate and the manufacturing quality competitiveness index. Other indicators, including green development, are far from the initial goals.

Indicator Achievement
Broadband penetration rate Met the standard
Manufacturing quality competitiveness index Met the standard
Green development related indicators (4 items) Far from the target

Ten Key Industries: Which Exceeded Expectations and Which Failed?

Of course, more attention is paid to the development of specific industries. At that time, "China Manufacturing 2025" выделялось ten key development industries and set quantitative goals. How are these industries performing now? Let's analyze them one by one.

According to the development situation, it can be roughly divided into three categories: exceeding expectations, mixed performance, and failing to meet expectations.

"Top Students" Exceeding Expectations

"Potential Stocks" with Mixed Performance

Project Indicator Achievement
New energy vehicles State-owned enterprises account for 50% of fuel vehicles in 2025 Foreign automakers occupy 65% of China's sales of fuel vehicles
Industrial software The market share of China's independent industrial software exceeds 50% More than 90% rely on foreign companies
Mobile phone (domestic) In the domestic mobile phone market, the market share of Chinese companies reaches 80% If Apple is included, it reaches 87%, but if Apple is excluded, it is only 72%
Mobile phone (international) In the international market, the market share of Chinese companies reaches 40% In 2024, the share of Chinese mobile phones (excluding Apple) in the world has reached 41%

"Laggards" Failing to Meet Expectations

Success in a Broader Sense: Who Won and Who Lost?

"China Manufacturing 2025" is only a means, not the ultimate goal. What is the ultimate goal of technological innovation? Is it to improve people's living standards or to enhance national competitiveness?

From the perspective of the people, "China Manufacturing 2025" is undoubtedly a failure. It has not helped China escape the middle-income trap, nor has it made Chinese people's lives better. On the contrary, some overdeveloped industries, such as photovoltaics and high-speed rail, have also brought problems such as overcapacity and waste of resources.

But from another perspective, "China Manufacturing 2025" may be successful for some goals. It has reduced China's dependence on foreign technology to a certain extent and enhanced China's confidence in confronting the Western world. Even if relations with the United States and other countries deteriorate, China can rely on its own established industrial base to achieve self-sufficiency.

In summary, "China Manufacturing 2025" is a complex project, and its success or failure is difficult to simply conclude. It has made significant progress in some areas, but has encountered setbacks in others. More importantly, we need to reflect on the ultimate purpose of technological innovation and how to make technological progress truly benefit all people.