The Ministry of Housing and Local Government (KPKT) is currently launching a full-blown attack, directly accusing the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) of irregularities in the Kiosk procurement! The situation unfolded when Housing Minister Nga Kor Ming publicly questioned the "nation's most expensive" Kiosk procurement approved by the Yong Peng Municipal Council, within MCA President Wee Ka Siong's constituency. A serious accusation indeed!
This immediately caused a stir. On one hand, some questioned whether Nga Kor Ming was "slapping his own face," as he himself had previously been accused of KPKT purchasing Kiosks at inflated prices. On the other hand, Ling Tian Soon, the Yong Peng assemblyman and Johor state executive councillor, immediately jumped in with four major questions, demanding clear explanations from Nga Kor Ming.
Kiosk Procurement Suspicion: Who is "Smearing"?
Nga Kor Ming's accusations were relentless. He stated that while he accepted criticism and oversight, he firmly rejected smearing. He emphasized that the facts now prove that MCA purchased the most expensive Kiosk. He even called on Wee Ka Siong to explain to the people, even expressing pity for MCA, believing that its leaders had reached a "dead end."
Such strong words indicate that the Ministry of Housing attaches great importance to this matter. So, what exactly is this "nation's most expensive" Kiosk procurement all about?
Ling Tian Soon Asks Housing Minister Four Questions, Directly Addressing Procurement Doubts
Faced with the Ministry of Housing's accusations, Ling Tian Soon did not back down but chose to respond directly, raising four questions on Facebook, each hitting the nail on the head:
- Question 1: If the Yong Peng Municipal Council's procurement price was the most expensive, why did the Ministry of Housing approve it in the first place?
- Question 2: If the Minister believes there are problems with the Yong Peng Municipal Council's tender, why not directly report the case and investigate it thoroughly?
- Question 3: Does the Minister believe that there may be administrative deviations or lack of transparency in the procurement process?
- Question 4: Can the Minister disclose the tender data so that the public can review whether there are any omissions in the entire process?
These four questions immediately pointed the finger at the Ministry of Housing. If the Ministry of Housing was aware of and approved the procurement in advance, is there also a problem of inadequate supervision? If there are indeed problems with the procurement process, why not take legal measures to resolve it? These questions require Nga Kor Ming to provide clear answers.
Procurement Data Comparison: Is the Price Really "Nation's Most Expensive" as the Minister Claims?
To give everyone a clearer understanding of the situation, we might as well organize the key information currently known for a more intuitive comparison:
| Item | Ministry of Housing and Local Government (KPKT) | Yong Peng Municipal Council (Wee Ka Siong's Constituency) |
|---|---|---|
| Kiosk Procurement Price | Unknown | Nation's most expensive |
| Tender Scope | 156 Municipal Councils Nationwide | Unknown |
| City Contractor Quantity | Approximately 800 | Unknown |
As can be seen from the table, the information currently available is relatively limited, and we cannot directly compare prices. However, since Minister Nga Kor Ming claims that the Yong Peng Municipal Council's procurement price is the "nation's most expensive," he should have sufficient data and evidence. Therefore, Ling Tian Soon's request to disclose the tender data is also a reasonable demand.
Event Follow-up: Can the Truth Come to Light?
This Kiosk procurement turmoil involves the Ministry of Housing, MCA, and local governments, making it complex. Is it normal market behavior, or are there secrets hidden behind it? This requires relevant departments to conduct in-depth investigations before the truth can finally come to light.
For Wee Ka Siong, this is undoubtedly a severe test. He needs to stand up and respond to the questions, explaining clearly to the public. And for the entire event, we will continue to pay attention, looking forward to the day when the truth is revealed.